Organizational Context and Capabilities for Integrating Care: A Framework for Improvement

Authors

  • Jenna M. Evans Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto; Staff Scientist, Cancer Care Ontario
  • Agnes Grudniewicz Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto; Collaboratory for Research & Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System
  • G. Ross Baker Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto
  • Walter P. Wodchis Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto; Research Scientist, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Adjunct Scientist, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2416

Keywords:

integrated care, integrated delivery system, organizational capabilities, organizational context

Abstract

Background: Interventions aimed at integrating care have become widespread in healthcare; however, there is significant variability in their success. Differences in organizational contexts and associated capabilities may be responsible for some of this variability.

Purpose: This study develops and validates a conceptual framework of organizational capabilities for integrating care, identifies which of these capabilities may be most important, and explores the mechanisms by which they influence integrated care efforts. 

Methods: The Context and Capabilities for Integrating Care (CCIC) Framework was developed through a literature review, and revised and validated through interviews with leaders and care providers engaged in integrated care networks in Ontario, Canada. Interviews involved open-ended questions and graphic elicitation. Quantitative content analysis was used to summarize the data. 

Results: The CCIC Framework consists of eighteen organizational factors in three categories: Basic Structures, People and Values, and Key Processes. The three most important capabilities shaping the capacity of organizations to implement integrated care interventions include Leadership Approach, Clinician Engagement and Leadership, and Readiness for Change. The majority of hypothesized relationships among organizational capabilities involved Readiness for Change and Partnering, emphasizing the complexity, interrelatedness and importance of these two factors to integrated care efforts. 

Conclusions: Organizational leaders can use the framework to determine readiness to integrate care, develop targeted change management strategies, and select appropriate partners with overlapping or complementary profiles on key capabilities. Researchers may use the results to test and refine the proposed framework, with a focus on the hypothesized relationships among organizational capabilities and between organizational capabilities and performance outcomes.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-31

Issue

Section

Research & theory